Monday, May 27, 2013

Final Essay


 

Tyler Justice

Mrs. Wilson

British Literature B

Bell: 5

Final Research Essay

28 May 2013

 

I have read and understand the sections in the Student Handbook regarding Mason High School's Honesty/Cheating Policy. By affixing this statement to the title page of my paper, I am certifying that I have not cheated or plagiarized in the process of completing this assignment. If it is found that cheating and/or plagiarism did take place in the writing of this paper, I understand the possible consequences of the act, which could include a "0" on the paper, as well as an "F" as a final grade in the course.



 

The most important themes in literature are sometimes developed in scenes in which a death or deaths take place. Choose a novel or play and write a well-organized essay in which you show how a specific death scene helps to illuminate the meaning of the work as a whole. Avoid mere plot summary.

 

 

 

 

 

Tyler Justice

Mrs. Wilson

British Literature B

23 May 2013

Death, a Vast Emptiness, which Epitomizes the Human Experience

“In each of us, two natures are at war – the good and the evil. All our lives the fight goes on between them, and one of them must conquer. But in our own hands lies the power to choose – what we want most to be we are” (Robert Louis Stevenson).  Society today finds death, at every corner, and people tend to act a certain way, when the subject of mortality is involved. People often view death as something to be feared but, sometimes one must embrace the idea of death, to have a greater sense of purpose in their everyday lives. Through the uses of death, characterizations, the theme of good vs. evil, the use of foreshadowing, and symbolism, Ian McEwan’s Amsterdam, William Blake’s “A Poison Tree”, Robert Browning’s “Porphyria’s Lover”, and John Bunyan’s “Pilgrim’s Progress”, the authors expose the darker side of life, one filled with evil, and the deadly price of that path. An individual, who has accepted the idea of death, may be not necessarily evil or good it is their actions following this brush with death, which defines them.

Through the use of characterization in all of the pieces, the authors show how each individual deals with the after effects of death.  In Amsterdam, George’s initial reaction to Molly’s death, is one of the doting husband however, in near the end of the novel his true motives are revealed. George for the duration of the novel seems to just be a grieving widower of Molly but, the twist is he had an ulterior motive throughout the novel. “Finally, after two hours of meandering and backtracking, George Lane had a good idea.” “Look, there was nothing wrong in purchasing those photographs. Actually, I can tell you this, I heard he got a jolly good deal. No, Halliday’s mistake was in not pulling the front page the moment he saw Rose Garmony’s press conference” (McEwan 138).  This quote used supports the claim that George used, Molly death, as a cover, to get back at her ex-lovers and those who had hurt her, in her various romances. While in Amsterdam, McEwan shows how the loved ones of the departed are affected, in “Pilgrim’s Progress”, Bunyan shows how those causing the death are suspicious due, to the traveler’s being different.  “The townspeople at Vanity Fair are immediately suspicious of Christian and Faithful, and they arrest the two pilgrims and bring them to trial. Three witnesses, Envy, Superstition, and Pick-thank, a favor-seeker, testify against Faithful. His fate is turned over to a jury of townspeople” (Bunyan 422). While Bunyan reinforces the idea that, the witnesses are going to convict the travelers due to their supposed “sins”, he shows they have no remorse. Similarly to this, in “A Poison Tree”, Blake shows how the narrator shows little remorse, for letting his rage grow. The metaphor of the tree is used to describe how the narrator, cultivated his rage, similarly one would a plant. “I was angry with my friend: / I told my wrath, my wrath did end. / I was angry with my foe: / I told it not, my wrath did grow” (Blake ll. 1-4). Bunyan has the narrator not be remorseful and he lets his rage grow, until it consumes him. In “Porphyria’s Lover”, Browning uses his characterizations to show how the lover, also has a lack of remorse. “Porphyria’s love: She guessed not how / Her darling one wish would be heard. / And thus we sit together now, / And all night long we have not stirred, / And yet God has not said a word!” (Browning ll. 56-60). Browning similarly to the other authors shows how death can affect those involved; this often has serious consequences for, both parties involved.

While the authors use the technique of characterization, to show how those involved with the death react, they also make use of the technique of foreshadowing.  In Amsterdam, McEwan makes use of foreshadowing, to show how Clive and Vernon’s friendship has decayed throughout, the novel and the unforeseen consequences it holds. McEwan uses this quote, to show how Clive knew that poison being the details of the rape he witnessed, Vernon could blackmail him. This also foreshadows the final events of the novel, when Clive and Vernon end up poisoning each other. “He knew from long experience that a letter sent in fury merely put a weapon into the hands of your enemy. Poison, in a preserved form, to be used against you long in the future” (McEwan 149). McEwan uses this quote in the novel to discuss the actual poison Clive and Vernon use on each other at the end of the novel as well as, the metaphorical poison each person has on each. Vernon knows Clive’s “poison” the details of the rape he witnessed, and Clive knows Vernon’s “poison” about him and how he obtained the photographs of Garmony. Both Vernon and Clive chose to act on the resentment they felt towards each other, at the end of the novel. While in “Pilgrim’s Progress” Bunyan uses the technique of foreshadowing to show how, the fates of Faithful and Christian were already determined. The people at Vanity Fair already decided to be suspicious of the strangers because they talked different and refused to buy their wares. “Now was word presently brought to the great one of the Fair, who quickly came down and deputed some of his most trusty friends to take these men into examination about whom the Fair was almost overturned….” (Bunyan 422). Bunyan does this to further elaborate on the fact, that the people of Vanity, with their vice and corruption, almost immediately distrust the strangers. Similarly to Bunyan in “A Poison Tree” Blake makes reference to the fact like the people of Vanity, the narrator of the poem does not trust strangers. The narrator of “A Poison Tree” makes use of his anger, to show his disdain for the stranger, who tries to steal from him. “And it grew both day and night, / Till it bore an apple bright; / And my foe beheld it shine, / And he knew that it was mine…” (Blake ll. 9-12). While in “A Poison Tree” the narrator contemplates of how to handle the stranger, similarly in Browning uses this technique to show the lover contemplating what to do about Porphyria. “For love of her, and all in vain: / So, she was come through wind and rain. / Be sure I looked up at her eyes / Happy and proud; at last I knew / Porphyria worshipped me: / Surprise Made my heart swell, and still it grew / While I debated what to do” (Browning ll.29-35). Browning uses the technique of foreshadowing, to show how the lover knows while Porphyria is his, but, she cannot be due to class distinction. The lover seems in this instance to truly love Porphyria and is his own, sick way shows it by killing her. While Browning’s narrator of the lover, and the narrator in “A Poison Tree” both contemplate fate, all of the pieces use foreshadowing as a way to show how events could turn badly in the future.

While the authors implore the technique of foreshadowing, they also use symbolism to wrap up their ideas that death is only the beginning of experiences. All of the pieces explore what life would be like after death and the symbolism behind it as a freeing experience. McEwan uses symbolism to show how, even after Clive and Vernon end up killing each other, death gave them what they really wanted. Even though, Clive and Vernon started out as friends they grew to hate each other over, the course of the novel, in the end death was the only release of the tension they felt for each other.  “They looked surprisingly at peace. Vernon had his lips parted slightly, as though he were halfway saying something interesting, while Clive had the happy air of a man drowning in applause” (McEwan 191). McEwan uses death to show how Clive and Vernon got what they wanted. Clive looked as though, he got massive applause he craved and Vernon looked as though, he was deep in some kind of thought. It is somewhat ironic that both Vernon and Clive spent their lives pursuing their ideals, and in death they found solace, in they got what they craved most in life. While similar to McEwan, Bunyan uses symbolism to show how Faithful, for not giving up on his ideals got to heaven, once again for faithful death acted as a release. Faithful now no longer subject, to the harsh realities he faced, like those at Vanity, does not have to fear persecution anymore. “Now, I saw that there stood behind the multitude a chariot and a couple of horses, waiting for Faithful, who (so soon as his adversaries had dispatched him) was taken up into it, and straightway was carried up through the clouds, with sound of trumpet, the nearest way to the Celestial Gate” (Holt 423). Bunyan comments on those, who pursue their ideals no matter what get rewarded. Bunyan does this by showing how Faithful, through his beliefs and not seeming to show resentment towards, those who killed him. Faithful is rewarded with admittance to the Celestial City, which is an allusion to Heaven. This contradicted by Blake’s view that those who steal what they want deserve death. Blake uses this idea to show how the only release for the narrator’s anger is for something drastic to happen to the intruder, who intends to steal from him. “And it grew both day and night, / Till it bore an apple bright; / And my foe beheld it shine, / And he knew that it was mine, / And into my garden stole” (Blake ll. 9-13). Blake uses symbolism in the apple, to both symbolically represent Adam, Eve and Original Sin, as well as his own ideals on punishment. Blake also uses symbolism in the metaphor of the tree, to once again reinforce his theme of the poem. Blake’s theme being ultimately that anger once started can only grow until; it is extinguished, usually by some act of violence. Similarly to Blake’s viewpoint on anger, Browning uses symbolism to further justify the lovers claim, that he did nothing wrong. The lover in some sick way seems to try to show how, his actions towards his beloved were justified. Browning’s lover attempts to say he did the right thing, because Porphyria can now be with her beloved forever, just not alive. Although the abuse of Porphyria’s corpse and seemingly psychotic state of her lover hint, she did not see the apparent signs of some mental illness he very clearly had. “Porphyria’s love: She guessed not how / Her darling one wish would be heard. / And thus we sit together now, / And all night long we have not stirred, / And yet God has not said a word!” (Browning ll. 56-60). The lover in Browning’s poem further attempts to justify his logic, by trying to confuse his sense of God, with a sense of justice. The lover also seems to exhibit no remorse or sense of wrongdoing in having killed Porphyria. The lover makes another constant attempt to justify killing Porphyria by, showing how he thinks he spared her from social embarrassment, if their relationship became public. Browning and the other authors uses symbolism to show how in death who, are affected can find the things that they apparently lack in life. However, the ways they act when faced with death define them as a person.

People often view death as something to be feared but, sometimes one must embrace the idea of death, to have a greater sense of purpose in their everyday lives. Through the uses of death, characterizations, the theme of good vs. evil, the use of foreshadowing, and symbolism, Ian McEwan’s Amsterdam, William Blake’s “A Poison Tree”, Robert Browning’s “Porphyria’s Lover”, and John Bunyan’s “Pilgrim’s Progress”, the author’s expose the darker side of life, one filled with evil, and the deadly price of that path. Does death, necessarily mean that the one who caused it is evil? This is not necessarily the case; death can come in many forms and manifestations but, a person’s actions afterwards, are what define them as an individual. Death is an ideal that is shrouded in myths; of good and evil but, both sides must be embraced. The double-sided coin must be embraced for it is; part of the human experience. People can see death in many different lights in life; one person can view it as a tragedy. This can be compared to other people in society who view death, as a sign of the relief from the pressures of life. The experience of death, is a natural occurrence and something that makes us human, it is natural to fear death, and at the same time embrace it. “In each of us, two natures are at war – the good and the evil. All our lives the fight goes on between them, and one of them must conquer. But in our own hands lies the power to choose – what we want most to be we are” (Robert Louis Stevenson). 

Work Cited

Blake, William. "A Poison Tree". Dumfries, North Carolina: Holt McDougal Inc., 2007. 718-732. Print. <http://my.hrw.com/tabnav/controller.jsp?isbn=0030789613>.

Browning, Robert. "Porphyria's Lover". Dumfries, North Carolina: Holt McDougal Inc., 2007. 907, 991-992. Print. <http://my.hrw.com/tabnav/controller.jsp?isbn=0030789613>.

Bunyan, John. The Pilgrim's Progress. Dumfries, North Carolina: 2007. 418-424. Print. <http://my.hrw.com/tabnav/controller.jsp?isbn=0030789613>.

Landis, Matthew. "Madness and Mysticism in the Poetry of William Blake." www.litkicks.com. litkicks.com, 21 Jul 2003. Web. May 9, 2013. <http://www.litkicks.com/Blake>.

McEwan, Ian. Amsterdam. 1st ed. New York: Anchor Books, A Division of Random House, Inc., 1998. 138-191. Print.

"pathetic fallacy." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2013. Web. 23 May. 2013. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/446415/pathetic-fallacy>.

"Porphyria." www.nlm.nih.gov. MedlinePlus, 20 May 2013. Web. 18 May 2013. <http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/porphyria.html>.

Stevenson, Robert Louis. "Quotes about Good and Evil." www.goodreads.com. goodreads.com, n.d. Web. 22 May 2013. < http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/good-and-evil>.

 

                         

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Victorian Period Essay


 


Tyler Justice

Mrs. Wilson

British Literature B

13 May 2013

The Darkness of Love, Porphyria’s Lover

The Victorian Period in British culture was one marked by sentimental conventions, women subject to male oppression, and a society of prudence (Holt 884-885). However, in the poem by Robert Browning, Porphyria’s Lover; Browning explores what in Victorian times would be considered taboo. In Porphyria’s Lover, Browning uses dramatic monologue, sexual undertones, pathetic fallacies, and social commentary to expose the reader to the darker and, more sinister, side of Victorian England.

In Porphyria’s Lover, Browning chooses the title of his due to the importance of the name Porphyria. Porphyria is actually a disease “There are two main types of porphyrias. One affects the skin and the other affects the nervous system. People with the skin type develop blisters, itching, and swelling of their skin when it is exposed to sunlight. The nervous system type is called acute porphyria. Symptoms include pain in the chest, abdomen, limbs, or back; muscle numbness, tingling, paralysis, or cramping; vomiting; constipation; and personality changes or mental disorders” (Medline Plus). One can infer that based on the disease called Porphyria that since, Porphyria in the poem is incredibly pale, she might have the disease that lent it her namesake. “She put my arm about her waist, / And made her smooth white shoulder bare” (ll. 16-17). Another clue from the poem that even her lover, may have the disease is, “Made my heart swell, and still it grew / While I debated what to do. / That moment she was mine, mine, fair / Perfectly pure and good: I found / A thing to do, and all her hair / In one long yellow string I wound / Three times her little throat around, / And strangled her” (ll. 34-41). The symptoms of the second type of porphyria or acute porphyria, this is what could have caused her lover’s disturbed mental state.

Opening, the poem Browning uses the technique of pathetic fallacy (Wilson). Browning does this in order “attribute human emotions or characteristics to inanimate objects or to nature” (Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.). Browning does this to convey the speaker’s tone, in the natural settings of the poem (Wilson). This is supported from the text by “The rain set early in tonight, / The sullen wind was soon awake, / It tore the elm tops down for spite, / And did its worst to vex the lake: / I listened with heart fit to break” (ll. 1-5). This sets the mood for the poem to be one that is dark, gloomy, and foreshadows Porphyria’s fate at the climax of the poem. The attitude of the weather also, parallels the attitude that Porphyria’s lover exhibits in the poem, one that is destructive and violent.

One technique that Browning uses throughout the poem is the use of sexual undertones to describe the feeling of intimacy the two lovers share with one another (Wilson). Evidence to support this is, “She put my arm about her waist, / And made her smooth white shoulder bare” (ll. 16-17). This line is used to show the trust and the intense relationship the two lovers share. Porphyria feels relaxed and comfortable around her lover (Wilson). This feeling of relaxation ultimately proves, to be Porphyria’s demise. This is supported by “And all her yellow hair displaced, / And, stooping, made my cheek lie there, / And spread, o’er all, her yellow hair, / […] A thing to do, and all her hair / In one long yellow string I wound / Three times her little throat around, / And strangled her” (ll. 18-20, 38-41). This relaxed state Porphyria feels with her lover, allows him to take advantage of her, and kill her.

Browning, decided to put the poem into a dramatic monologue format, so that we can understand the lover’s view on what happened that night (Holt 990). Dramatic monologue is “a poem written in the form of a speech of an individual character; it compresses into a single vivid scene a narrative sense of the speaker's history and psychological insight into his character” (Dictionary.com). This way the reader has insight to the lover’s state of mind, during the eventual murder of Porphyria. Evidence to support this is “And strangled her. No pain felt she; / I am quite sure she felt no pain” (ll. 41-42). Browning also uses social commentary to show how despite the pairs love, they can never be together due to the social pressures of the times, “Murmuring how she loved me—she / Too weak, for all her heart’s endeavor, / To set its struggling passion free / From pride, and vainer ties dissever, /  And give herself to me forever” (ll. 21-25). Another quote that shows how social classes divided the lovers is, “But passion sometimes would prevail, / Nor could tonight’s gay feast restrain” (ll. 26-27). As the reader you gain the sense that the lovers, could never be together in public, due to Porphyria’s lover being from a much lower social status (Wilson).

However, while reading the poem you must consider the fact, that Porphyria’s lover is an unreliable narrator (Wilson). Since, the poem follows the dramatic monologue format you must consider, that Porphyria cannot be telling the story because, she is dead. We can infer from the lover’s narration of the events that her wish, of them being together can be fulfilled. This is supported when he says, “Porphyria’s love: She guessed not how / Her darling one wish would be heard. / And thus we sit together now” (ll. 56-58). Another reason that makes the “lover” an unreliable narrator is when he says, “No pain felt she; / I am quite sure she felt no pain” (ll.41-42). The lover says this as an attempt to justify the crime of murder, and further his claim; that what he did was for the best. Another quote where yet again the “lover” an unreliable narrator is, “And thus we sit together now, / And all night long we have not stirred, / And yet God has not said a word” (ll. 58-60). This text also supports the lovers claim, that Porphyria’s murder was justified. The lover seems to not show any sign of guilt, for having murdered his beloved, and uses his pretense of God to justify the crime.

In Porphyria’s Lover, Browning uses dramatic monologue, sexual undertones, pathetic fallacies, imagery, and social commentary to expose the reader to the darker and, more sinister, side of Victorian England. Browning uses these techniques to show the darker and more tragic side of love, and the view of a man who tries to justify murder, more reminiscent of the Edgar Allen Poe and the Dark Romantics (Holt 990). Browning in Porphyria’s Lover tries to make the reader dive in the psyche of a mad-man, who thought he did what was best.

*      Work Cited:



 

 

Thursday, May 9, 2013

Romatic Period Essay

 


Tyler Justice

Mrs. Wilson

British Literature B

9 May 2013

Romantic Period Essay

The Romantic Period in British History is a period marked by imagination, inspiration, intuition, and in individuality. This is true especially in the work of William Blake who uses allusions, symbolism and metaphors in his work. He uses literary devices in his work The Poison Tree, to show his view on how conflict should be handled, and the ideas of sin (Lorring). The poem The Poison Tree, like most work of the Romantic period shows human nature, as a relevant and constant theme throughout the piece (Holt 731).

Blake often wrote his works in cryptic but, still they exhibited his optimism as a writer. In The Poison Tree, “Blake’s subject is anger, and his theme is his insight into what anger is and does. In poetry the theme is rarely stated directly. More often, it is implied by all the details, images, and symbols of the poem and must be deciphered by the reader” (Holt 731). Blake often wrote in this cryptic style because "There was no doubt that this poor man was mad, but there is something in the madness of this man which interests me more than the sanity of Lord Byron and Walter Scott." (Landis).

The subject of Blake’s poem often focused on religion. Blake many works focused on religion in part to “Blake's father was an avid follower of Emmanuel Swedenborg who was a Swedish scientist and religious teacher. Swedenborg abandoned his studies of science in 1747 after claiming that he understood the inner nature of human beings (what he called the divine Word) after experiencing a vision in 1745. These visions reoccurred throughout his life as well as his supposed communications with angels. He published exegetical texts on Scripture in which he claimed he had received his interpretations from God himself” (Landis). The theme of religion that constantly appears in The Poison Tree, the idea of Adam of Eve from the Bible, “Till it bore an apple bright; / And my foe beheld it shine, / And he knew that it was mine, / And into my garden stole” (ll. 10-13). Blake does this also because in the poem his subject is anger or the deadly sin of wrath, “I was angry with my friend: / I told my wrath, my wrath did end” (ll. 1-2).

Another idea that Blake uses to symbolically represent the anger the narrator feels is when he says, “I told it not, my wrath did grow / And I watered it in fears, / Night and morning with my tears” (ll. 4-6). Blake does this in attempt to comment on how anger only grows by metaphorically comparing the wrath, the narrator feels to a tree. “Blake is telling the reader that fear and anger go together. One can assume that the fear of the speaker is unfounded as there has been no mention of threat from the foe. Fear can force people to think and do things that are highly out of character. This emotion can take one to a dark place, as it does with the speaker” (Lorring). Another line that shows Blake commenting on the fact that rage only grow is when he says, “And it grew both day and night, / Till it bore an apple bright; / And my foe beheld it shine, / And he knew that it was mine” (ll. 9-12). Another line that shows how the narrator wants his wrath to grow is when he says, “And I sunned it with smiles, / And with soft deceitful wiles” (ll. 7-8). “A Poison Tree” is Blake’s warning to the reader about what unchecked anger can do. Such an emotion can become poison to people's minds if allowed to grow” (Lorring).

Finally, the end of the climaxes with the lines “And my foe beheld it shine, / And he knew that it was mine” (ll. 11-12). Blake reaches the climax in these lines to show how like Adam and Eve the foe, gave into the temptation before him and tires to steal from the narrator. In the end of the poem we see the narrator, quenched his wrath by killing his foe. This is supported in the lines “And into my garden stole / When the night had veiled the pole: / In the morning glad I see / My foe outstretched beneath the tree” (ll. 13-16). The speaker doesn’t realize the extent of his actions fully yet, he stopped the intruder however, he now committed murder. “No matter what the anger-poisoned speaker may believe, this is not a victory. “A Poison Tree” is Blake’s warning to the reader about what unchecked anger can do. Such an emotion can become poison to people's minds if allowed to grow. Communication and releasing such emotions before they fester is the safest path to resolve conflict” (Lorring).

Blake seemed to want to help people come to a deep sense of individuality in The Poison Tree, by exposing them to the dangers of one’s anger. “And Blake sees it as his task as a poet and engraver to uncover what we have hidden from ourselves the infinite. Blake's temperament, his mood swings, his visions, were not so much, as Wordsworth states, a symptom of madness but rather, as Blake seems to assert, his sensitivity to the mystical underpinnings of life” (Landis). Blake’s purpose of writing the poem is to expose the darker side of humanity. Blake in The Poison Tree uses metaphors, symbolisms and allusions to show the dangerous side of one’s anger and the need to look for an individual outlet to safely release one’s anger. If one would fail to do this catastrophic events would happen, like in the poem, when one’s rage boiled over.
 

Works Cited:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Neoclassical Period Essay



Tyler Justice

Mrs. Wilson

British Literature B

8 May 2013

Neoclassical Period Essay

The Neoclassical Literary period was a major turning point, for English Literature. This period mark the end of the dictatorship of Oliver Cromwell, and the restoration of the monarchy (history-timelines.org.uk). The period is also famous because the intellectuals of the time, now wanted to focus on the educating the public, not just the aristocracy like the decades before (559). Many writers of the time wanted to look towards, their Roman contemporaries especially; during the Augustan period for inspiration and thus, make the “new classics” (599).

Another difference between the reign of Cromwell and the neoclassical era was the difference between the social classes was more defined with the “Haves” and the “Have-Nots” (566). The classes the embraced the vice and corruption of the new era were the “Haves”. These people were the very ones that many writers satirized because; this group actively participated in gambling, prostitution and other sins (566). The neoclassical writers mainly focused on the morality of the “Haves” and questioned how many could be obsessed with wealth and pleasure instead of reason (566). The “Have-Nots” were the people that stressed reason and knowledge above the ideals of sin and vice and often questioning the morality and materialistic attitudes of their societies in their works (566).

One of the most common literary devices they used was to educate the public at the time was satire. Satire is the use of irony, sarcasm and ridicule to expose vice, corruption or folly. Many writers during the neoclassical period condemned people of their times, for living only on material possessions and not on the worth of the individual. Under the rule of King Charles II the English citizens again found their voice however, it came at a price being forced to convert from the Anglican Church back to Catholicism (562-563). Being forced to convert their religion to appease their sovereign didn’t go over well with Charles subjects, and Catholicism is one of the most satirized subjects from the period.

A writer at the time, who condemned the crown, was John Bunyan however, unlike his fellow writers Bunyan was from the lower class. Bunyan felt that he had a right to educate his fellow Baptist during his lifetime, his religious ideology being the subject of many of his works. Bunyan was in fact arrested and jailed twice for attempting to force subjects of Charles II to, not practice Catholicism. Arguably his most famous work was The Pilgrim’s Progress, in which, Bunyan uses various Biblical allusions and satire to condemn the world of the neoclassical era, one filled with and corruption. Bunyan also uses his work to condemn the various vices of humanity and question the morality, of their actions. With this work he educated the public on the corruption of their society, at a time when doing so was dangerous.

In The Pilgrim’s Progress Bunyan tells the story of two pilgrims Christian and Faithful, as they travel to the Gates of the Celestial City or Heaven. Along the way on their travels the pilgrims encounter the Fair at the city of Vanity, which they pass through on their journey. The two pilgrims are met with hostility upon, entering the town. They are looked at with suspicion and hostility due to the fact that the pair dress and speak different from those in Vanity. “Secondly, and as they wondered at their apparel so they did likewise at their speech; for few could understand what they said; they naturally spoke the language of Canaan; but they that kept the Fair, were the men of this world: so that from one end of the Fair to the other, they seemed barbarians each to the other” (Bunyan, 422).  The townsfolk at Vanity, upon their suspicions arrest Christian and Faithful. They are tried by people of the town, who represent the various vices of humanity. “Then went the jury out, whose names were Mr. Blind-man, Mr. No-good, Mr. Malice, Mr. Love-lust, Mr. Live-loose, Mr. Heady, Mr. High-mind, Mr. Enmity, Mr. Liar, Mr. Cruelty, Mr. Hate-light, and Mr. implacable, who every one gave in his private verdict against him among themselves, and afterwards unanimously concluded to bring him in guilty before the Judge” (Bunyan, 422). Bunyan is satirizing Charles II, due to him allowing prostitution and other crimes to run rampant, under the guise of theatre and the arts. Bunyan is grateful that the King restored the arts but, he’s angry that a place of prostitution is, also a place of art.

However, the trial was a short lived affair with an immediate guilty verdict returned, and Faithful was condemned to death. Faithful and Christian were separated and Faithful was killed with all of the deaths that were punishable for heretics. Faithful and Christian were persecuted against because they were different and refused to buy wares at Vanity, due to they were just passing through. “They therefore brought him out to do with him according to their law; and first they scourged him, then they buffeted him, then they lanced his flesh with knives; after that they stoned him with stones, then pricked him with their swords; and last of all they burned him to ashes at the stake. Thus came Faithful to his end” (Bunyan, 423). After Faithful’s death, Christian remained in jail for the rest of his days and in the end of his life, he completed his journey. Before the end of the tale, Christian encounters Hopeful and together they complete their journey to the Celestial City. This parallels the events in Bunyan’s life; he is hopeful, that one day he will not be persecuted for his religion. In the end of tale, both Faithful and Christian, made the way to Celestial City and were both, welcomed into the arms of God. “Now just as the Gates were opened to let in the men, I looked in after them; and behold, the City shone like the sun, the streets also were paved with gold, and in them walked many men with crowns on their heads, palms in their hands, and golden harps to sing praises withal” (Bunyan, 423).

In the wake of this piece and its overall impact gradually religious tolerance retuned once again to England similar to, before the reign of Cromwell and Charles II (history-timelines.org.uk). Finally, in 1688 the English subjects ruled by Charles’s brother James II had enough, they allowed William of Orange to invade, and he was made England’s new king. This time King William III allowed his people to practice what religion they wanted because, he was a Protestant (562). King William III established toleration of religion and did not force his subjects, to comply with Christianity. Works after the reign of James II and into the reign of William III practiced satire; however, unlike in James’s reign they didn’t have to fear the crown (562).

 

Works Cited: